Down To a Sentence

Credit: http://www.freeimages.com/

“If he knows one thing, it’s that we don’t know much of anything…” (speaking of myself in the third person)

Forcing oneself to distill their essence down to one phrase, one sentence, one thing…that can be a tough thing for any one of us to do. Despite this sentiment being fairly universal we actually practice it every single day, only in this scenario, we have no qualms with doing so. Wondering why this might be true despite my previous assertion? Well, in short, here’s the answer: we do it to others all the time.

Whether in person, through a third person behind another’s back, or, most commonly, over social media, we make judgements and distillations about other beings constantly. This isn’t necessarily bad or malicious (my goal in this post is to literally do the same to myself), but as more of a natural function of social interaction; however, this can be easily informed by our personal biases and anecdotal experience above all else.

What I’m getting at via my basic understanding of the nature of reducing people to a particular sentence is that I didn’t personally acknowledge it until recently. Probably up until Senior year of high school, I have (admittedly, naively) assumed that others around me must certainly appreciate the amount of stock I have in considering my whole, complex identity. As I became an increasingly bigger fish in a slowly shrinking social pond (i.e. becoming an upperclassmen, fighting to hold onto the familiarity of high school, etc), I would come to realize that without my physical presence holding my complexity and entirety behind, I wouldn’t have the chance for others to truly understand me. Somewhat begrudgingly, I would shift my focus more towards creating a personal legacy for myself in society, almost as though I expect death to come knocking and wish to live on via lineage and story. I would realize, more concretely as part of this blog additionally, that this personal sentence would be the next best thing.

All throughout my high school journey, one term that has stuck out and continues to resonate with me is the Jesuit concept of “radical equality,” which speaks to the universal equality we share with every person irrespective of any number of the socio-economic, race/ethnic, and cultural borders that seemingly “divide” us. While most times this concept is attributed to more pressing contexts regarding widespread societal issues, I believe it can also be applied to this more microcosmic issue of distilling oneself down to a sentence.

I have concluded that each of us faces this paradox of wishing for others to see the complexity in those things we hold personal while at the same time seeing no reason to do the same for others. And therein I found it, my sentence! We are truly equal in our laziness to reduce others to some specific notion. My sentence encapsulates my realization of this, and I work every day to not make these preconceived judgements, these reductions in identity of others, especially when I can’t seem to do the same to myself. I guess I live my own rendition of the “Golden Rule” in this sense. We all deserve more, but it’s a fact in my book that we more often than not choose simplification over complexity.

You’re Being Audited…

Credit: http://www.freeimages.com/

Normally, I associate being audited with being someone who has their hands stuck in the “proverbial cookie jar” in areas of business or politics. However, in this case, I must put these thoughts aside and take a critical look at my own social media habits with the same unbending scrutiny as an IRS investigator would with a person of interest.

In terms of social media use, I tend to spend most of my time either on Instagram or Reddit, the former being for personal interactions and keeping up with friends, and the latter mainly as a time waster in some personal subreddits that I feel community with as well as those I find amusing or intriguing.

Although I do utilize these apps and social media platforms the most, I use others as well, namely Snapchat, Twitter, and least of all, Facebook. Snapchat I again use to keep in touch with friends via daily streaks and direct messages/snaps, and Twitter is sort of an in-between for using Reddit to find news, fun facts, and usually keep up with my favorite online content creators on YouTube and Twitch (mainly for gaming content). Facebook on the other hand is a platform I’ve almost stopped using entirely, mainly because my family’s posts are so awkward and politically charged that I hardly browse my feed for the most part, not to mention my general disgust for the UI of both the app and the desktop version.

Social media has definitely made most of my communication change to become far more instant, and has caused me to be constantly vigilant and looking for people to respond back sometimes to a fault. This can be both a blessing and a curse, as it’s great to not have to wait for an entire phone call or email for a response, but a detriment in that I’m sometimes anxious about checking my phone without paying attention to what’s happening right in front of me.

In terms of what I hope to get out of social media as a class, I hope to see if I can build my own “brand” of sorts by getting experience through outreach for our non-profit group.

Let’s “Not” Fake it ’til We Make it This Time

Oftentimes nowadays it feels that more and more we have to actively refute lies and untruths more-so than fairly evident truths and facts. Sure, there have been centuries of recorded falsehoods and sensationalized media created in order to attempt to further or demean a particular cause or group of people (think of examples like Yellow Journalism by William Hearst, state sponsored media in dictatorships like Nazi Germany and North Korea, and Russian propaganda trying to lessen nature of Russia’s involvement in the Crimean invasion and Malaysia Airlines Flight 17), but it also appears that the digital age has exasperated the issue of fake news and misinformation.

With the advent of social media, the floodgates have truly been opened in this regard. Despite the various types of content supposedly being offered on differing sites like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc, fake news and misinformation runs rampant seemingly regardless of which company or organization owns it. Specifically on Twitter, as this article by The Atlantic references, studies have shown that “…falsehood consistently dominates the truth…Fake news and false rumors reach more people, penetrate deeper into the social network, and spread much faster than accurate stories” (Meyer, The Atlantic). And it’s easy to see why this might be true from the outside looking in. As just an immediate, anecdotal example, I had to fight the urge to simply copy and paste this quote for the purposes of this post, and rather have chosen to dive deeper, now seeing the source of Science, a publication of credibly sourced scientific studies and articles, aggregating an MIT based study. Knowing the extra amount of effort this takes, despite my feeling fairly confident in my discernment of accurate news and reporting, is even more troubling when I extend this extra time to literally any number of people online.

With this in mind, the next step should be to illuminate others as to the importance of always keeping news discernment a priority when reading stories online, rather than just regurgitating, reposting, or retweeting whatever story they have time to read and respond to emotionally during their most likely busy day. But if we want this problem to stop, we have to confront it. Not in the sense that we always try and directly confront those that don’t respond well to being told they’re spreading fake news (because Lord know’s I’ve tried and failed miserably in similar choice situations), but instead by offering steps to become healthy skeptics. This approach allows for both a heightened detection of outright falsity as well as an increased acumen for spotting highly biased or decontextualized information. Even NPR, a news organization is willing to put itself under scrutiny saying “traditional news organizations are more reliable because their business model is to paint the clearest picture of the world that they can manage. But in the post-trust era, we know that any news source can steer you wrong at times, and they’re likely all jumbled together in your news feed anyway” (Steve Inskeep, NPR).

At the basest level, while it’s easy to posture about how simple it can be to educate others about being more discerning, it’s still important regardless. I believe that going forward, there should be an element of computer and media courses during elementary and high school at least that go over discerning sources online, and of different forms of verification on social media. While this issue equally affects almost all age groups online, quelling the problem for future generations is a great way to cut off the head of this demon in the form misinformation, which leaves the bulk of the issue in a more manageable, stable position to be dealt with.

Credits:

W. Clement Stone quote – BrainyQuote

The Grim Conclusions of the Largest-Ever Study of Fake News – The Atlantic, Robinson Meyer

A Finder’s Guide to Facts – NPR, Steve Inskeep

“Free” Press

The free press, often lauded as a bastion of maintaining an informed public in both our American democracy as well as those around the world, is under attack from myriad sources nowadays. Not a day goes by where a politician or government official finds themselves above criticism or mere observation by the general public, instead undermining democracy rather than face their critics. By trashing unfavorable journalism and media, often equating reputable organizations to suppliers of fake or extremely biased news, as a standard instead of as an exception to the rule, these “officials” have reduced the public’s receptiveness to supporting reporting and ethical journalism.

Hand in hand with this disruption of quite a bit of the public’s trust of journalism is another massive attack that comes in the form of lack of monetization for smaller news organizations as well as those that don’t subscribe to wholeheartedly prioritizing salacious or “clickbait” content. In today’s highly sensationalized, extremely fast-moving world, more traditional reporting has fallen by the waysides as it’s not immediately appealing to the widest demographics of both consumers and advertisers. In the past 15 years or so alone, almost 1800 local newspapers have closed (BBC article) as a result of these issues of subscriber retention and advertising troubles, which is just a sad correlation to see represented in data. Not only is this reality troubling on the basis of many journalists, writers, and editors losing their jobs in a highly competitive industry, but also because this loss of informative reporting will be incredibly detrimental to the overall health of our democracy. We’ll start seeing less society-changing exposes, each of which likely being replaced with celebrity lifestyle tips or “You Won’t Believe What Just Happened” titles followed by relatively inconsequential substance. Nowadays, only 24 hour news media has the resources to maintain their current business models.

One of the biggest hurdles that news organizations must leap over now that they face such overwhelming opposition is transitioning their forms of monetization and company values to keep up with the times (and the Times). In terms of finding payment for their companies, news orgs should look towards digital subscriptions with incentives, such as faster story output for subscribers and increased sale of products and services in addition to actual reporting, all the while never downplaying the importance of journalism and news reports (10 Ways News Media Companies Can Move Into a Profitable Future). Additionally, there needs to be an industry-wide conversation in which news orgs clearly state their personal values for reporting. Sure, there’s plenty of space in the world for breaking news reports, entertainment tabloids, and more opinion-based pundits, but if these companies want to be credible media sources they need to value the morality of watch-dogs and journalism above that of only producing the most “gotcha” news possible.

The podcast conversation with Nicco Mele did address some of these issues. He believed that peak advertising took place a few years back, and that the amount of content available has stretched ad dollars too thin. He suggested that two revenue changes for news orgs would remedy some of these issues, specifically requesting subscription models and switching paywalls out with incentives to promote subscriptions instead of walling off content. He also stressed the importance of keeping advertisers and marketing separated from the journalism and reporting teams, while at the same time meeting halfway to actually fulfill a surviving business with employees and expenses.

People need to realize in the age of quick consumption and heightened advertisement that there should be a free press, but that we must also support the press through direct subscription and paying opportunities if we don’t wish to see important journalism fall to the wayside.

Credits:

10 Ways News Media Companies Can Move Into a Profitable Future – Editor and Publisher

Why Local US Newspapers are Sounding the Alarm – BBC

A Digital Rorschach

Just as the internet has seemingly changed every aspect of modern life, journalism included, so too has it provided corporations and organizations with plenty of inventive, engaging, and in some cases deceptive forms of public relations and advertising to interface with their intended internet consumers.

Picture the “outward face” of a company, their public relations arm to be more precise, and think of the statements that a given PR or advertising department releases as a Rorschach blotch, holding several unique meanings to each and every consumer. In the digital age, these intended meanings are being constantly thrown aside and changed for new ones in order to appear increasingly trendy and personalized, leaving consumers and the public in disarray as to their discernment of corporate and organizational messaging.

In this emotionally heightened, lightning-fast period of public relations with consumers of content, those wishing to enter the industry of PR have to be just as quick on their feet to adapt to what’s expected as an employee. Public relations is no longer just about keeping the public informed of a company or organizations’ actions as the Forbes reading states, but rather a greater commitment to align “public relations and marketing” alongside a shift “from journalist/writer-based public relations to a customer-focused approach.” In a sense, this change is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it’s great for PR employees and customers to have a more personal, custom-tailored relationship in order to push products, ideologies, and intended responses in a more direct way. On the other hand, it makes it continually more difficult for consumers to discern when they are solely being “marketed to” versus when marketing is merely used as a tool to get a PR point across in such a saturated online world. Ultimately, and definitely to a worrying extent, this discernment is solely left to consumers and journalistic watchdogs to hold companies and other organizations accountable for their honesty. All of this follows how I perceived PR works from a consumer’s perspective, with the caveat that I am increasingly worried about the honesty of morally-gray companies and organizations in their public outreach and discourse (i.e. how much of their language is truthful concern/marketing and how much is face-saving).

In addition to the new faces of public relations today, advertising has taken on an entirely new, increasingly intrusive nature online and beyond. In all sorts of media today, even trusted news sources, advertising and product placement is running rampant. In class, we’ve discussed the blurring of lines between advertising and journalism specifically, with sponsored articles and how they are framed as being as credible as editorials despite being created to advertise a product or company. The inherent dishonesty in coming close to deceiving less discerning consumers is quite evident, and seemingly won’t change to fit Rushkoff’s insistence that the internet should not operate with the goal of advertising over communication unless regulation on advertising is allowed.

I consider myself quite discerning in terms of seeing through the intent of advertisements, and generally regard most ads with disdain and a block from my mind, although I understand that companies need to get word out on their products as a necessity. The most an ad can do for me is perhaps elicit a laugh or smile for the marketing team’s self-awareness or witty writing, but I see through how I’m being targeted for such ads more often than not. I value a company taking the risk for an honest review of their products than jamming product placement down my proverbial throat (these examples of fairly shameless product placement from this week’s reading in entertainment media like movies are extremely transparent to me, and make me detest how much the product makes me cringe instead of makes me want to make purchase). I also have a decent amount of respect for cause-related marketing, as at the very least it makes a visible impact on communities of people and shows a certain level of commitment, even if the intent behind it is merely to save face and improve public outlook.

Credits:

Rorschach Gif – From the Film Watchmen, Property of Warner Bros.

What You Can Expect From the Future of Public Relations – Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesagencycouncil/2018/07/12/what-you-can-expect-from-the-future-of-public-relations/#3cb57a97710a

The Delicate Art of Product Placement Advertising – https://www.thebalancecareers.com/the-delicate-art-of-product-placement-advertising-38454

The Man Behind the Curtain

While examining the Frontline documentary Generation Like, I found myself wincing both at how outdated the user interfaces and internet lingo already is after only 4 years of progress online, as well as at how obviously geared towards making consumers market and promote company’s products for them the internet and especially social media were, even back in 2014. This second point actually hits home especially hard in our present day, as recent examples of internet influence by foreign actors like Russia or data collection by companies like Cambridge Analytica shine as clear examples of how highly manufactured and artificial interactions on the internet can be, whereas in 2014 the relative freshness of social media left only social influencers and content creators in the loop as to the behind the scenes work for various actions like ad campaigns. In much of the documentary, “transparency” in marketing is highlighted as a “profound” change in the age of internet marketing, but in recent years “transparency” often only acts as a PR facade to engender trust in a given brand.

Rushkoff, as the writer, director, and producer of this documentary, follows similar assertions to those he’s made previously in his books and presentations, and chief among these assertions is articulating the danger in supporting an internet based on advertising alone, as it hinges almost entirely upon the emotional manipulation of its user base for marketing purposes accomplished at varying levels of moral integrity. Many users don’t mind data collection and targeted advertising as long as it furthers ease of use when shopping or utilizing a given service (Transparency In Online Advertising), but most will also agree that this willing release of information for a product deserves actual transparency in terms of what and when exactly we’re trading our privacy. Personally, I share this worry similarly to Rushkoff, that the corporate ideology that the internet is merely an outlet for advertising first and foremost is dangerous, and that without proper investigation and regulation the internet and social media will remain a faux-transparent, manipulative landscape we’re constantly conditioned to take at face value.

As the video reaches its end, it addresses that we, the generation “like” that can be so easily manipulated, actually has the opportunity to jump on the marketing train and be our own brands. While this was just a burgeoning idea in 2014, the proof most certainly is in the pudding nowadays, with the myriad Soundcloud rappers, YouTube personalities, and meme pages gaining traction and revenue through smart promotion, branding, and monetization. Still, it’s easier for existing mega-corporations to hire extremely talented marketing teams and artists to find what sorts of online interactions sell, or in this case, generate the most traffic and likes. While the barrier for entry into online spaces like YouTube is quite low, the amount of competition as a result is overwhelming. Without being an established content creator with a few years under their belt, it can be almost impossible to compete with more advertiser-friendly or corporate-backed channels (Why ‘Success’ on YouTube Still Means a Life of Poverty) without resorting to secondary monetization like Patreon or paid subscriptions. While this reality is annoying and quite costly for creators in the short run, the extra true “transparency” offered under specific, paid subscriptions creates a stronger, more real social bond between two different parties on the internet, which is something that nebulous ad-placements will never truly capture.

The Man Behind the Curtain is visible online now, it’s just up to us to find if what he says at the end of the day is genuine with all pretense stripped away.

Credits:

The Wizard of Oz – Warner Bros.

It’s Time to Increase Transparency in Online Advertising – Forbes, Timothy Nichols

Success’ on YouTube Still Means a Life of Poverty – Fortune, Bloomberg

Wide As an Ocean, Deep As a Puddle

“Watch that first step, it’s a Doozy”

In certain video games with an advertised length of around 20+ hours of gameplay, especially those that contain freely open game worlds with hundreds of quests and items to collect, many gamers attempt to gauge the level and quality of the content included within this game of choice. With almost 8,000 games released this past year on Steam, the biggest online PC games store (Report: 7,672 games were released on Steam in 2017/Polygon), publishers are constantly under pressure to advertise the most hours of gameplay possible in order to gain any leg up on their massive market competition, and so game devs are often forced to throw in content of variable fun and quality to pad whatever hour mark is deemed necessary. The growing ubiquity of these sorts of game worlds and experiences in modern gaming has many calling these massive, yet barren open worlds as “wide as an ocean, but as deep as a puddle.”

I feel that this phrase can be applied quite aptly to the nature of communication over the internet, although with recognition for the heavy dose of hyperbole present in such an absolute statement. While we can communicate with more people than ever before at any time in human history in an instant, we also have begun to miss out more and more on the important social interactions that most human psychologies necessitate. We have an entire ocean of people to connect with on an equal level, which in and of itself is a  stellar achievement, but the sad reality is that a majority of those interactions only have the capacity to affect us on a surface level, a mere passable splash in the proverbial puddle.

In my own anecdotal experience, the biggest issues that I find both myself and my friends facing when only having social media communication is a lack of ability to confide or have intimate conversations. The only times I tend to have these moments is when myself or someone else is on the verge of tears, or have/had to build up an immense amount of courage to come forward looking for help or guidance. This comes down to both a need to self-improve in willingness to be open about emotional distress as well as an all too often forced detachment from socialization via the context of the internet. As Rushkoff puts it, social media is “terrifically suitable for long distance communication…but rather awful for engaging with what – or who – is right in front of us” (p.40).

As with most activities, the internet dictates we value moderation over saturation, because if we deprive ourselves of richer, personal social interactions for extended periods of time we can become socially, emotionally, and psychologically inhibited. Several studies conclude that “social interactions can enhance good health through a positive influence on people’s living habits…emotional support…and can foster ‘a sense of meaning and purpose'” (NYT article on Social Interaction). While there are social interactions that can and do take place on the internet, they are of an entirely different variety from the usual interactions we have and often need to embrace in real life outside of the digital world.

Credits:

Groundhog’s Day GIF – Credit to Movieclips.com, Columbia Pictures

Steam Games in 2017 article – Ben Kuchera, Polygon

Social Interaction – Jane E. Brody, New York Times

 

Connecting Without Being Connected

This prior weekend I found myself on a retreat in which I was unable to really utilize any electronics or access the internet for almost a full 24 hours, and in my constantly connected world, this mere day of restriction reminded me both of the intake of daily information I take for granted and the habits I’ve formed that center around using my cell phone.

Since this retreat was a structured event, there were certain required activities to take up time away from my phone regardless of my own efforts, but I also had an additional 4 or 5 hours of unspecified time to myself in which I felt the real struggle to go against the grain of constantly pulling out my phone and checking my various social media feeds and messaging services. I did bring some card games to provide a sort of distraction through games and entertainment, although I was so engrossed in the other activities I describe in just the next paragraph that I didn’t get around to utilizing these either.

In terms of the activities I did during my electronic-less hiatus, the most common was just merely socializing. I really enjoyed kicking back and hearing how somebody is doing that day as much as any other, in as serious or as jovial a nature as need be. From recounting funny experiences to just talking about preferred music or movies, I felt free to discuss plenty of things without even thinking about my touching phone after a surprisingly short amount of time. This experience helped me realize that sometimes just being free to talk with others can make a world of difference to both them and to myself, and that my life online can sometimes get in the way of arriving at those “rich mental connections” (Inc article on difficulty of divorcing online habits from offline situations: Internet Habits).

Additionally, while it’s arguable that this might be more the focus of the retreat than my exercise in abstaining from technology, I actually found myself feeling more present in my environment. Whether that’s noticing and paying attention to those around me, taking in all the sights and sounds of wildlife and nature or, what I believe is most important, reflecting upon my life and personal relationships over the course of anything from one day to one year. One such moment of reflection I really appreciated during this retreat was during a prayer and reflection time in which someone recited the Maya Angelou poem Human Family, which really energized my willingness to engage with those around me, to indulge in how each of us diverse people are “more alike…than we are unalike.” With this in mind I felt that having my electronic devices unavailable for the retreat, especially during these reflective exercises, really forced me to tune in to what was being discussed at a time where I otherwise might be distracted by a million other things on social media or other services.

As soon as I returned to the world of data connections, I found myself in an odd rush to pick up the pieces in a sense, from answering some texts from family members to making sure I didn’t miss any bigger news just in that one. The closest analogue I thought of to this feeling would be diving head-first into classwork after a short break like a Fall or a Spring Break.

Credits:

Illustration by Darius Foroux

Article by Peter Economy, Inc Magazine

It Was the Best of Times, it Was the Worst of Times…At Times

At times, the thought of being overwhelmed by social media, entertainment, and messages (whether they’re for important reasons or otherwise) on the internet is all too real. Despite the common notion that younger people don’t check their emails, I find myself checking and responding to both my personal and university emails altogether too many times a day. Beyond even that, regardless of my literal popularity on these platforms, I find myself over-absorbed into checking the newest posts on Instagram, Reddit, or any number of other social media sites whenever I’m faced with even a millisecond of downtime or waiting in line for one thing or another.

Without this somewhat scary habit I’ve formed around using my technology constantly in mind, I find it mostly cathartic to be routinely immersed inthe communities of highly varied, highly diverse people online and to share my opinion on relatively benign matters. During high school, social media would often be my sole outlet of interaction with other friends once I would be off-campus simply for the reason that I lived a decent distance away from both my school and their homes.

The fear of missing out, or FOMO, has been a very real thing that I, and I’m sure many others, have felt and still feel on a routine basis. While I feel in control whenever making decisions, the FOMO can greatly influence if and when I interact with others both online and offline as the context of the internet often heightens emotional reactions and cyclically reinforces either a positive or negative reaction (HuffPost Article on Cyclical/Emotionally Charged Depression on Social Media).There have been just as many times where I view someone’s post of them hanging out with other friends and feel depressed about missing out as when I’ve reached out on a post to talk or organize a meet up. My fear of missing out is characterized almost entirely by an air of equal opportunity for enjoyment and missed opportunity, which is why at times this chaotic relationship can be circumvented to positive affect with a nice internet break whenever I’m feeling overwhelmed, whether this is through listening to music, playing games, or more drastically participating in retreats and similar events.

There is most certainly a middle ground between embracing the often complex, almost secondary society of the web and saving social interaction for the real world. At this point in my life, while FOMO still affects, I feel I possess a fairly discerning eye for when I should be emotionally invested in the social exploits of friends, family, and myself online and when I should just separate any emotional weight from social media posts. While the usual parental warning of “needing to get outside for some sunlight” is quite hyperbolic in this case, as people spend ridiculous amounts of time online regardless of age in America (Pew Research Stats on Social Media), it is a necessary thought to have as an extension of moderating time spent online.

Credits:

Illustration by Dan Sipple, Getty Images

Article by Ales Zivkovic, HuffPost

Statistics from Pew Research Center

Starting the Year “In Media Res”

Welcome to my blog! My name is Chris Banister, a Sophomore at Creighton University, and I’m taking this class as a part of my Computer Science course requirements.

I titled this particular post “Starting the Year ‘In Media Res'” because 1) I love the literary plot device which means “in the middle of things” in Latin (Link to a great example of in media res from one of my favorite movies: Ratatouille Opening) and 2) I thought it would be a fun pun as I feel my year has already begun “in media res” considering I have helped with welcome week and other events and that this course concerns media.

In terms of familiarity with media, I am fairly proficient at finding both the news sources I need as well as the entertainment and interesting information I crave on a daily basis. I enjoy more intensive web browsing and longer sessions of online videos on my computer, but I have just as easily lost countless hours of time on my phone as well to good and ill effects. My trusted news sources are spread across various different platforms such as YouTube, podcasts, cable coverage, Reddit, and several others. The obvious correlation between my use of most of these sources is that almost all of them originate from an online source. In terms of both cost and convenience, the near instant access to information and connection to people across the world offered by the internet puts it far and away better than any prior method of communication. Sadly, despite my praises of the internet, I must admit there are cons as to how the it can shape the future of the world in terrifying and dangerous new directions.

News media can often be a double-edged sword in my mind in quite a few ways. On one hand, the efficacy, power, and importance of news media is highly essential to maintaining a highly literate and well-informed populace, and this relationship between people and press is rightly protected in our 1st Amendment. On the other hand however, the absolute ubiquity of media sources (in the 21st century especially) often dilutes that quality of fact-based reporting and in recent years tends to revolve around click-bait and emotional arousal of one socio-political group versus another for maximum monetary gain (Link to PolitiFact article on clickbait: How Clickbait Ads Make Money).

In terms of experience with programming, I’m fairly literate in HTML, JavaScript, Python, and Java, with all this knowledge stemming from my courses in Creighton that I had taken Freshman years. I wouldn’t however say that I’m proficient, as I haven’t undertaken any intensive personal programming projects outside of class quite yet.

Living in such a connected world, I find it beautiful that so many differing ideas, cultures, and influences are able to prosper in relative equality over the internet and other similar sources of media. The concerning aspects of this interconnectedness, however, are twofold, in that much of social media presence can be overly superficial and not lead to genuine social interaction regardless of geographic distance, and that bigger corporate/government influence can override the voice of the general public in quite a few cases unbeknownst to most people.

Credits:

• Youtube Video uploaded by “gerry ko”, and I’m sure the rights for Ratatouille go to the Walt Disney Company and Pixar Animation Studios
• Article “How Clickbait Ads Make Money” by Joshua Gillin and published by PolitiFact